Initialization was still a minefield:
JavaScript developers who faint at the sight of && or :: . Or anyone who thinks Python’s GIL is "not that bad." Final note: If you're writing C++ today (C++20/23), thank 2013. That was the year the committee stopped polishing the deck chairs on the Titanic and started rebuilding the ship. 2013 c++
Review by a recovering C++98 programmer
2013 was the year C++ stopped being your dad’s systems language and started flirting with modernity. The ISO standard known as C++11 (published late 2011) had finally trickled down from compiler god-mode to everyday build systems. GCC 4.8.1 was solid. Clang 3.3 was a revelation. Even Visual Studio 2013— yes, Microsoft —started playing catch-up with real move semantics and variadic templates. Let’s start with auto . In 1998, auto was a joke—a keyword that meant "please ignore me." In 2013, auto meant finally, I don't have to type std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Foo>>::const_iterator like a medieval scribe . Review by a recovering C++98 programmer 2013 was
std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) { std::cout << x * 2 << "\n"; }); Smart pointers ( unique_ptr , shared_ptr ) moved from "Boost-only magic" to standard-issue memory safety. Raw new and delete started looking like exposed wiring in a modern home. But let’s not rewrite history. C++ in 2013 still had teeth—and fangs. Move semantics were powerful, but the rules for when a move happens vs. a copy were arcane enough to require a PhD in "value category theology" (lvalues, rvalues, xvalues, glvalues, prvalues... shudder ). Clang 3
Foo f1(); // Most vexing parse: it's a function declaration. Foo f2{}; // Ah, uniform initialization. Unless it isn't. And compile times? You could brew coffee, drink it, and contemplate your life choices while #include <boost/spirit/> did its dark magic. std::string didn’t have starts_with() or ends_with() . You rolled your own or used .find() == 0 like a savage. std::regex was in the standard—but its performance was so tragically slow that many shops banned it in hot paths.
It was ugly in places. It was over-engineered in others. But for the first time in over a decade, C++ felt alive .
Have you seen one of our printables for sale?
All printables on this site are offered free for personal and classroom use, if you see them for sale outside of our shop please drop a line below and let us know! We never want anyone to pay for, or profit from, a printable that we offer free of charge.
For Teachers
Favorite Printables is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a way for websites to earn advertising revenues by advertising and linking to Amazon.com
Printables are for personal use only.
Signup below to get all the latest new printables sent straight to your inbox!